MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037062389

Disciplining preschool children, parent interaction

2000· other· en· W7037062389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2000
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBig Data and Digital Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDyadSocializationContext (archaeology)Content analysisSample (material)Qualitative researchSocial relationField (mathematics)Child discipline
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This qualitative study explored the interaction within a mother-father dyad regardi g child discipline of their preschool child in terms of: (a) their perceived discipline roles, (b) the socialization of parenting discipline style, (c) communication patterns regarding discipline, and (d) discipline problem solving and decision processes. A focused-ethnographic design was used to guide the research process. A purposive sample of 8 mother-father dyads, recruited from daycare, nursery school, and parent support group settings, participated in the study. The conceptual framework guiding this study is family interaction theory within the context of family developmental theory. Data analysis included content analysis of the interview transcripts and field notes to identify categories and themes. Data analysis revealed three themes: Learning About Discipline Takes a Life Time; Discipline: So What About It? and parents: The Discipline Team. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.156
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it