MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037084228

Design and laboratory validation of an in-ear noise dosimetry device

2019· article· en· W7037084228 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsInstitut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail
KeywordsNoise (video)Filter (signal processing)Work (physics)Troubleshooting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The assessment of noise exposure is a major component of any hearing conservation program. It is
\nusually conducted using either sound level meters (SLM) or personal noise dosimeters (PND). Some
\nsignificant problems arise when performing noise exposure measurements using SLMs or PNDs.
\nFirst, these devices do not usually account precisely for the variations of the actual noise exposure
\nexperienced by a given worker over the work shift. Additionally, the attenuation provided by the hearing
\nprotector that is worn is only taken into account very approximately. To address these issues, the
\npurpose of this study is to implement a precise and reliable in-ear noise dosimetry system based on
\nlow computational algorithms that can be used in a wide variety of environments and work conditions.
\nThe adopted methodology focuses on the implementation and validation of a real-time measurement
\nsystem. The proposed system utilizes a set of two miniature microphones placed inside and outside
\nthe earcanal. Besides, two types of in-ear prototypes were developed: one for the unoccluded ear
\nand one for the ear occluded with a passive earplug. The validation of the in-ear devices prototypes
\nand algorithm implementation was done using data collected during a study on human subjects. Both
\ndeveloped hardware and software elements make it possible to determine correction factors enabling
\nthe conversion of the measured in-ear noise exposure levels to their equivalent free-field values. Furthermore,
\nthe implemented algorithms can detect and exclude wearer-induced disturbances (speech,
\nmicrophonics, etc.) making it possible to assess noise exposure with and without the energy contribution
\nfrom these self-generated noises. This paper presents a successful implementation and validation
\nof an in-ear noise dosimetry system, with unique features and capabilities, that could lead to the
\nimprovement of methods and systems for personal noise exposure assessments in the workplace.
\nKeywords: acoustics, in-ear noise dosimetry, hearing-protection, occupational health and safety,
\nacoustics, instrumentation, real-time algorithms implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)Same topicSulfur-Based Synthesis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207