Curator “Language without language, Language inspite of language” Video Programme Videonale.Scope
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 10th edition of the video and experimental film series VIDEONALE.scope in cooperation with IMAI - Inter Media Art Institute took place on 30.11. + 01.12.2023 at Turistarama in Cologne. For the anniversary edition, four filmmakers and artists who have already accompanied VIDEONALE.scope on other occasions − Eli Cortiñas, Ayesha Hameed, Ji Su Kang-Gatto and Vika Kirchenbauer − curated a programme for the thematic framing "Open Your Scope − Counter Narratives". In the programme, dominant narratives were questioned and alternative constructions of reality were tested under changing focal points. "Scope" is literally understood in translation as an expanded frame or room to maneuver: Away from the canon, the artistic works process marginalized knowledge and experiment with new narrative forms. \n \nLanguage beyond language. Language inspite of language explores the sea, feminine strength, seismic forces and the shamanic through gestures, glitches in movements, breathing and sounds. Together, these concepts form their own materially tactile vocabulary. Through videos by Sancintya Mohini Simpson, Jane Jin Kaisen, and Alberta Whittle, a sound work by Himali Singh Soin and a conversation about language, gestures and silence with Anna Jäger, SAVVY Contemporary, language becomes saturated with itself, pointing to deeply internal aspects that transcend what is said. \n \nOn view were: \n \nSancintya Mohini, Simpson Blood-Link, 2013 \nAlberta Whittle, Reset, 2019 \nJane Jin Kaisen, Offering – Coil Embrace, KOR 2023 \nHimali Singh Soin, An Affirmation, 2022
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.689 | 0.361 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".