« De lâinterculturel de valeurs à lâinterculturel de faits », entretien croisé avec Jacques Proulx et Tania Ogay
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet entretien, Tania Ogay, professeure en sciences de lâéducation à lâUniversité de Fribourg (Suisse), et Jacques Proulx, professeur de psychologie à lâUniversité de Sherbrooke (Canada), nous livrent quelques réflexions sur la spécificité, les apports et les défis de la recherche interculturelle, en lien avec leurs expériences et pratiques respectives. Nous avons profité de la présence de ces deux chercheurs reconnus au XIIIe congrès de lâAssociation internationale pour la recherche interculturelle (ARIC), qui sâest tenu à lâUniversité de Sherbrooke du 19 au 23 juin 2011, pour les réunir et prendre le temps dâéchanger sur ce thème à la fois flou et dâune urgente actualité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it