MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037169749

D'une littérature de la souveraineté vers une souveraineté littéraire : l'ironie dans le discours essayistique de Liberté de 1980 à 1986

2018· other· fr· W7037169749 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval) · 2018
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelation (database)Order (exchange)Meaning (existential)Identity (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce mémoire a pour corpus les essais parus dans Liberté entre mars 1980 et février 1986, période pendant laquelle François Ricard assumait la direction de la revue. Il veut mesurer la place de l’ironie dans la revue et circonscrire ses formes diverses en se penchant principalement sur les textes de Ricard lui-même, d’André Belleau et d’Yvon Rivard, mais également la mettre en relation avec l’indépendantisme québécois. En quoi une conception de l’indépendance partagée dans la revue migre-t-elle de la chose au mot ? Nous tenterons de comprendre le rôle d’une culture globalisante de l’ironie dans ce déplacement. Si les travaux critiques englobant la question de l’essai québécois des années 1980 ont souvent noté un repli sur l’intime propre à cette décennie, le Québec demeure, à Liberté, une pierre angulaire du discours essayistique. L’ironie peut-elle émerger comme compromis entre un désir de se défaire d’« une question nationale obsessionnelle et indépassable » et le besoin, toujours existant, de revendiquer une forme d’indépendance, dorénavant plus littéraire que politique ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0120.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval)Same topicPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsFrench-language works237,207