MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7037169837

The effects of a dietary or «in ovo» exposure to the pentabrominated diphenyl ether mixture, DE-71, on retinol and thyroid hormones in captive American kestrels («Falco sparverius»)

2010· dissertation· en· W7037169837 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Wildlife Research CenterNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsRetinolReproductionThyroid hormonesHormoneThyroidDiphenyl etherIn ovo
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CHAPTER 1 -Literature review: An introduction to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and the thesis research rationale, aim and objectives Use……………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Chemical structure and properties……………………………………………….. 2 Release and occurrence in the environment……………………………………... 2 PBDE findings and trends in wildlife……………………………………………. 4 Effects of PBDEs on mammalian and avian species…………………………….. 7 Reproductive effects…………………………………………………….... 7 Thyroid hormones………………………………………………………... 9 Retinol…………………………………………………………………... 10 Project rationale, aim and objectives..………………………………………….. 11 CONNECTING STATEMENT………………………………………………………… 13 CHAPTER 2 -The effects of a dietary or in ovo exposure to the pentaBDE mixture, DE-71, on retinol levels of captive American kestrels (Falco sparverius): a possible explanation for changes in reproduction and growth Abstract………………………………………………………………………….14 Introduction……………………………………………………………………... 14 Methods…... ………………………………………………………………….... 16 Study site and details…………………………………………………… 16 Sampling procedures…………………………………………………… 18Plasma vitamin A (retinol)……………………………………………... 18 Reproductive measures………………………………………………….18

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering→French-language works237,207→