MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7037223683

Development of a Windows[superscript]T[superscript]M 3-D sound system using binaural technology

2000· other· en· W7037223683 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2000
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStonefly species taxonomy and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSound (geography)Noise (video)Binaural recordingControl systemSound systemSound recording and reproductionMicrophone
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is anticipated that 3-D sound will become a major component in virtual reality environments. In this thesis, we investigate the development of a Windows(TM) 3-D sound system using binaural technology. This work should eventually be integrated in complex virtual environment software. The 3-D sound effects are achieved by applying a filter pair representing audio cues from a specific point in space to the left and right channels of headphones. As a first step, an offline 3-D audio file generation system is developed, and effects such as sound reflections in a virtual rectangular room are added to this system. The real-time implementation is considered next. The first approach tested for the real-time implementation uses the time domain convolution of a sound source signal with head-related transfer functions, but the computational load of this approach is such that it cannot run in real-time at audio sampling rates. As an alternative, a second approach with a Fast Fourier Transform overlap and save technique is used to reduce the computational load, and a real-time implementation at audio frequencies is therefore successfully achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.130
Teacher spread0.125 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicStonefly species taxonomy and ecology→French-language works237,207→