Departures and Arrivals at the CHA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Departures and Arrivais at the CHAAfter having firmly held the reins of the CHA secrétariat for more than three years, Lyne St-Hilaire-Tardif has moved on toward new horizons, namely those of the Association of Canadian Archivists.Lyne could hâve claimed with ail accuracy that she was the CHA.The secrétariat is effectively the central hub of the organization, assuring the smooth operation of ail the components scattered across the country.Lyne always faced the unexpected problems and emergencies with unflappable good humour.It was thanks to Lyne that the CHA underwent a technological transformation in acquiring a computer and laser printer.Nothing could stand in the way of improving the efficiency of the secrétariat.In her farewell letter, Lyne sent her regards and best wishes to ail with whom she had worked during these past three years.For our part, we thank her for ail the help which she gave us.We wish her ail the best in her new position with the Association of Canadian Archivists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".