Detection of Common Arrhythmias by the Watch-PAT: Expression of Electrical Arrhythmias by Pulse Recording
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Giora Pillar,1 Murray Berall,2 Richard B Berry,3 Tamar Etzioni,1 Yaakov Henkin,4 Dennis Hwang,5 Ibrahim Marai,6,7 Faheem Shehadeh,6 Prasanth Manthena,8 Anil Rama,9 Rebecca Spiegel,10 Thomas Penzel,11 Riva Tauman12 1Sleep Laboratory, Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel; 2Center of Sleep and Chronobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 3UF Health Sleep Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; 4Cardiology Department, Soroka Medical Center, Be’er Sheva, Israel; 5Kaiser Permanente San Bernardino County Medical Center, Fontana, CA, USA; 6Cardiology Department, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; 7Baruch Padeh Medical Center and the Azrieli Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Poriya, Israel; 8Sleep clinic, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 9Sleep Clinic, Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center, San Jose, CA, USA; 10Department of Neurology and Sleep Center, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA; 11Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Sleep Medicine Center, Berlin, Germany; 12Sleep Disorders Center, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelCorrespondence: Giora Pillar, Sleep Laboratory, Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, 31096, Israel, Tel +972 4 8250258, Fax +972 48250699, Email gpillar@technion.ac.ilBackground: The WatchPAT (WP) device was shown to be accurate for the diagnosis of sleep apnea and is widely used worldwide as an ambulatory diagnostic tool. While it records peripheral arterial tone (PAT) and not electrocardiogram (ECG), the ability of it to detect arrhythmias is unknown and was not studied previously. Common arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation (AF) or premature beats may be uniquely presented while recording PAT/pulse wave.Purpose: To examine the potential detection of common arrhythmias by analyzing the PAT amplitude and pulse rate/volume changes.Patients and Methods: Patients with suspected sleep disordered breathing (SDB) were recruited with preference for patients with previously diagnosed AF or congestive heart failure (CHF). They underwent simultaneous WP and PSG studies in 11 sleep centers. A novel algorithm was developed to detect arrhythmias while measuring PAT and was tested on these patients. Manual scoring of ECG channel (recorded as part of the PSG) was blinded to the automatically analyzed WP data.Results: A total of 84 patients aged 57± 16 (54 males) participated in this study. Their BMI was 30± 5.7Kg/m2. Of them, 41 had heart failure (49%) and 17 (20%) had AF. The sensitivity and specificity of the WP to detect AF segments (of at least 60 seconds) were 0.77 and 0.99, respectively. The correlation between the WP derived detection of premature beats (events/min) to that of the PSG one was 0.98 (p< 0.001).Conclusion: The novel automatic algorithm of the WP can reasonably detect AF and premature beats. We suggest that when the algorithm raises a flag for arrhythmia, the patients should shortly undergo ECG and/or Holter ECG study.Keywords: home sleep apnea test, WatchPAT, obstructive sleep apnea, arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".