The Effect of Large Wood Restoration on Algal Biomass and Spatial Distribution in the Narraguagus River
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) is an anadromous fish native to the eastern US and Canada. Though they used to inhabit much of the eastern coasts of New England and Canada, the last of the United States’ wild Atlantic Salmon are now mostly limited to Maine. Due to habitat destruction from dams and historic logging activity, the quality of food sources, spawning grounds, and essential juvenile salmon habitat have been severely impacted. This habitat is the rearing area for many young salmon, and its quality influences their growth and recruitment into the overall Atlantic salmon population. Restoration of Atlantic salmon in Maine typically focuses on these freshwater rearing habitats, reconnecting headwater streams to the ocean using process-based habitat restoration like the addition of large wood structures to the stream to improve habitat quality. Large wood structures utilize natural processes to trap organic detritus, redirect and alter water flow, and restore ecological processes that foster ideal spawning conditions in the riverbed. Ideally these log structures would encourage winding, meandering stream flow, provide habitat for aquatic insects, and encourage a transition from muddy and sandy substrates to the cobble beds that are ideal for salmon spawning. Ongoing research at UMaine is examining the effects of restoration techniques on insect population structures, substrate, detritus breakdown, velocity, and algal biomass. My thesis as a subset of this project tracks the progress of large wood restoration through its effect on the spatial distribution of algae across 10 test and reference sites in the upper Narraguagus river. We analyzed characteristics of the system pertaining to large wood to determine which had the greatest effect on algal biomass and distribution. We found that the null hypothesis (factors not affected directly by large wood) was the best model, and that velocity and substrate alone were statistically equivalent. This suggests that restoration status had a lesser effect on algal communities than velocity and substrate. Though we cannot conclude from our analyses that restoration impacts algal communities directly, further analyses into the impact of large wood restoration on velocity and substrate may clarify whether it is indeed helpful to algal communities or not.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".