MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037289184

Effect of alkali-silica reaction expansion on mechanical properties of concrete

2019· dissertation· en· W7037289184 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltimate tensile strengthCrackingFlexural strengthAggregate (composite)Young's modulusThermal expansionCementModulusCompressive strength
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alkali-silica reaction (ASR) is a chemical deterioration process which arises in concrete due to reactive aggregate from its constituent, sufficient alkalis from cement or external resources and humidity about 85%. ASR gel, formed by the reaction, absorbs water and expands so that it causes expansion and cracking in concrete. ASR has detrimental effects on mechanical properties of concrete. Therefore, ASR which is a long and a constantly progressive reaction may become a threat to the safety of concrete structures. This experimental study focuses on two main subjects. The first one is the effect of ASR on mechanical properties of concrete, which are compressive strength, flexural strength, splitting tensile strength, modulus of elasticity and pullout strength at expansion of over 0.04 % and the second one is the impact of the type of specimen on ASR expansion, which differs as prism, cube, and cylinder. Concrete specimens in different types for tests include not only fine river sand, a reactive aggregate, but also coarse limestone, a non-reactive aggregate. As known, some standards like ASTM C1293 and Canadian CSA–A23.2-14A, describe aggregates causing expansion more than 0.04% in concrete within 1 year as potentially deleteriously reactive. Firstly, immediately after the expansion of the specimens, exposed to ASR exceeded 0.04%, the mechanical tests were performed on both them and the control specimens. Secondly, the specimens, exposed to ASR for longer time, were tested at expansion of over 0.10% to investigate ASR effect on mechanical properties. The investigation results confirm that expansion of over 0.04% in concrete from ASR caused losses in mechanical properties of concrete at different rates. With higher expansion, losses increase significantly especially in flexural strength and pullout strength of concrete. Moreover, higher rate of expansion in prisms than cubes at any time and cylinders proves that the type of specimen has an important role on rate of ASR expansion according to results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it