"Ebrios e ignorantes". Las percepciones del crimen, asociado con los indígenas, en la Mérida de fi nales del siglo XVIII y comienzos del XX. Estudio de dos casos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente artículo pretende abordar el tema de la criminalidad en torno a los indios de la Cordillera de Mérida a finales del siglo XVIII y principios del siglo XIX a través de dos juicios cuyos expedientes reposan en el Archivo General del Estado Mérida. El primer caso, trata de un sumario de 1800, seguido para averiguar las causas por las cuales un indio de la población de Ejido fue violentamente golpeado por un "vecino". Aquí se evaluará la importancia de la condición social y económica del indio como variable del crimen y la agresión. El segundo caso (1796) está referido a una causa por las \nresunciones sobre un labrador de Timotes que habría dado muerte a un indio. En este caso se determinarán los motivos circunstanciales del hecho y la condición social como condicionante y objeto de la agresión, así mismo las implicaciones del sistema punitivo con respecto a los procedimientos de la defensa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".