Enfants de migrants : l'apparente double appartenance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cette recherche, 39 enfants et adolescents roumains vivant à Québec et Montréal ont été interrogés. Nous nous sommes intéressé aux variables influençant le processus d'acculturation (PA) et aux effets de celui-ci sur l'identité culturelle (IC) des jeunes migrants. D’une part, les résultats indiquent que certains sujets vivent une période de confusion émotionnelle et identitaire. Bien que la connaissance de la langue d'accueil et sa pratique quotidienne ait une place centrale, c'est le jeu des relations entre les variables développementales, de socialisation et linguistiques qui décrivent le mieux le degré d'acculturation auquel parvient le migrant. Pour les plus âgés, il semble que le PA interagit avec la construction de leur identité. Cette interaction amène ces jeunes à redéfinir leurs caractéristiques personnelles. D'autre part, nous montrons que le noyau de valeurs qui forme l'IC, souvent considéré comme très résistant aux changements, peut varier d'un jeune migrant à l'autre, alors que tous sont issus de la même culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".