Discours sur le corps et la sexualité des femmes : analyse de la réception médiatique du mouvement Femen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le mouvement Femen est un groupe féministe international qui manifeste seins nus. Au Québec comme un peu partout dans le monde, les Femen attirent l’attention des médias. Le discours médiatique entourant ce mouvement constitue donc un objet d’étude intéressant afin d’explorer la question plus large du rapport au corps et à la sexualité des femmes. Dans le cadre de ce projet, une analyse critique de discours a été menée sur 214 textes issus de cinq groupes de quotidiens québécois francophones. Alors qu’on tend à penser que l’égalité entre les sexes est atteinte au Québec, le discours médiatique québécois entourant le mouvement Femen révèle que le corps, la nudité et la sexualité des femmes font l’objet d’un contrôle social en plus d’un regard patriarcal, colonialiste et hétéronormé. \n_____________________________________________________________________________ \nMOTS-CLÉS DE L’AUTEUR : Femen, agentivité sexuelle, slut-shaming, discours médiatique, féminisme, corps, nudité
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".