MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037356931

The dome-behavior analysis of the groin vault in the St. John Hospital in the Old City of Jerusalem

2012· article· en· W7037356931 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFlorence Research (University of Florence) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicStudy of Mite Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEleventhVault (architecture)Quarter (Canadian coin)ChapelSpan (engineering)Old town
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The St. John Hospital is part of a larger complex of buildings known as the Hospitallers Quarter, located to the south of the Holy Sepulchre. The building of the oldest part of the Quarter, made up from the Benedictine monastery of St. Mary of the Latins and the pilgrims' chapel dedicated to St. John the Almoner, dates from the eleventh century. The whole area of the Quarter, today called the Muristan, was until the end of XIX century one of the most neglected areas of the Old City. Between the end XIX century and the first half the XX century the Quarter underwent profound transformations. Also the St. John Hospital over time was significantly changed, even through heavy demolition. At present the Hospital looks like a irregular volume both in height and in plan. It is covered by ten domed vaults resting on very stocky pillars. The interest in this structure lies in the fact that, strictly speaking, this is not constituted by cross vaults. In fact, each span is not formed by the intersection of four cylindrical surfaces, but of double curvature surfaces. Therefore this structure is a dome-shaped vault.
\nIn order to analyze the structural behaviour of one of the domed vaults, some laboratory tests were made on a 1:5 scale model built with materials and construction techniques similar to those of the original.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFlorence Research (University of Florence)Same topicStudy of Mite SpeciesFrench-language works237,207