MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W70373662 · doi:10.5006/c2007-07128

Methodology for Ranking SCC Susceptibility of Pipeline Segments Based on the Pressure Cycle History

2007· article· en· W70373662 on OpenAlexaff
J. A. Beavers, Clifford J. Maier, C. E. Jaske, Robert Worthingham

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)Ranking (information retrieval)Petroleum engineeringComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Operating pipelines are subjected to cyclic loadings, primarily as a result of pressure fluctuations. The cyclic loadings are a contributing factor in crack growth by near-neutral pH stress corrosion cracking (SCC). As part of pipeline integrity management programs, it is necessary to perform threat assessments of pipelines and prioritize segments of the pipelines for risk from the various threats. This paper describes methodologies for ranking pipeline segments for risk from near-neutral pH SCC based on the cyclic loading history. The approaches are based on over ten years of research funded by the Pipeline Research Council International, (PRCI) and the Gas Research Institute (GRI) and relates the strain rate or displacement rate at pre-existing cracks in the pipeline, calculated from the pressure history, with crack growth rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207