MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037419690

Eficiencia del transporte férreo de carga Internacional:
\nUn análisis a través de la envolvente de datos
\n(Efficiency of railways international freight:
\nan analysis with data envelopment)

2014· article· en· W7037419690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEl Repositorio Academico Digital de la UANL (Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData envelopment analysisBenchmarkingProduct (mathematics)Economic efficiencyScale (ratio)Value (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: In this paper based on the methodology of Analysis of Data Envelopment (DEA), the efficiency is calculated 32 countries with the largest trade flows for 2013. During the first stage, the overall technical efficiency is determined, which is calculating the product of pure technical efficiency and the efficiency of scale. In a second, benchmarking analysis given
\ncurrent inputs and outputs as well as the target was carried out. The results shows that the
\ncountries of China, United States, Singapore and Thailand show overall technical efficiency; China, United States, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore and Thailand have pure technical efficiency and the countries of Brazil, Canada, China, United States, India. Russia, Singapore
\nand Thailand have scale efficiency. With respect to Mexico, although it is not efficient according to the results shown there are different proposals and guidelines to follow which should give priority to the decrease of costs by 62.67 percent to the value of 318.57USD; increase rail infrastructure and pathways electrified by 85.88 percent for each item.
\n
\nResumen: En este trabajo a partir de la metodología del Análisis de la Envolvente de Datos (DEA), se calcula la eficiencia 32 países con mayor flujo de comercio para el año 2013. en una primera etapa, se determina la eficiencia técnica global, la cual es el producto de la
\nmultiplicación de la eficiencia técnica pura entre la eficiencia de escala. en un segundo apartado, se realizó un análisis de benchmarking considerando los inputs y outputs actuales de tal forma que derivado del estudio se puedan dar estrategias a seguir para los casos no
\neficientes. En los resultados se observa que los países de China, Estados Unidos, Singapur y Tailandia muestran eficiencia técnica global; China, Estado Unidos, Hong Kong, Japón, Singapur y Tailandia tienen eficiencia técnica pura y los países de Brasil, Canadá, China,
\nEstado Unidos, India. Rusia, Singapur y Tailandia poseen eficiencia a escala. Por lo que respecta a México, si bien no es eficiente acorde a los resultados mostrados existen diferentes propuestas y lineamientos a seguir donde se deberá dar prioridad a la diminución
\nde los costos en un 62.67 por ciento hasta alcanzar el valor de 318.57USD; aumentar la infraestructura férrea y las vías electrificadas en un 85.88 por ciento para cada rubro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it