MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037436268

Dramatic X-ray spectral variability of a Compton-thick type-1 QSO at z similar to 1

2018· article· en· W7037436268 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Space AgencyDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsVariation (astronomy)Spectral lineLuminosityNoise (video)Quasar
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the discovery of a dramatic X-ray spectral variability event observed in a z ∼ 1 broad line type-1 QSO.The XMM-Newton spectrum from the year 2000 is characterized by an unobscured power-law spectrum with photon index of ∼ 2, a column density of N H ∼ 5 × 10 20 cm -2 , and no prominent reflection component.Five years later, Chandra captured the source in a heavily-obscured, reflection-dominated state.The observed X-ray spectral variability could be caused by a Compton-thick cloud with N H ∼ 2 × 10 24 cm -2 eclipsing the direct emission of the hot corona, implying an extreme N H variation never before observed in a type-1 QSO.An alternative scenario is a corona that switched off in between the observations.In addition, both explanations require a significant change of the X-ray luminosity prior to the obscuration or fading of the corona and/or a change of the relative geometry of the source/reflector system.Dramatic X-ray spectral variability of this kind could be quite common in type-1 QSOs, considering the relatively few data sets in which such an event could have been identified.Our analysis implies that there may be a population of type-1 QSOs which are Compton-thick in the X-rays when observed at any given time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207