MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037445951

The Electronic Device with Resistance Switching Behavior based on Different Mechanisms

2023· dissertation· en· W7037445951 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringMemristorVon Neumann architectureMiniaturizationEnergy consumptionElectronicsResistive random-access memoryResistive touchscreen
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the limitations of materials and structures, the performance of the von Neumann structure of traditional computers cannot meet the needs of today's people. The development of new electronic devices is the most effective way to improve the performance of computers. Devices with resistive switching behavior can realize simultaneous operating data storage and processing, which greatly saves the space required for device integration and reduces energy consumption at the same time. These advantages provide it with huge potential in advanced technology fields such as machine learning and neuromorphic computing. However, there are still challenges such as stability, miniaturization and working environment before this device realized its business purpose. In this thesis, memristor with rectifying effect is fabricated successfully, and its possible applications of neuromorphic computing and logic operations are discussed. In addition, two different methods were used to prepare phase-change materials, which are expected to be fabricated into phase-change memories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207