Effective Protection of Contemporary Heritage of Twentieth Century Architecture: The Case of Seville
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research addresses the effective protection of architecture built last twentieth century as one of the main challenges of heritage preservation for the twenty-first century. At this time, the concept of heritage is extensive, allowing us to consider this comtemporary architecture also as part of the legacy of our cities. In recent decades, the international heritage recognition and conservation of these buildings has been progressed. This fact has been made possible thanks to the record of twentieth-century architecture, as well as the publication of some international charters which have included recommendations about how to deal with this heritage. In the Spanish case, protection has been usually provided through the heritage catalogues including in urban plans. Nevertheless, contemporary legacy usually has less recognition and protection than buildings from earlier times. Therefore, many buildings have been demolished or extremely modified, losing their cultural heritage values consequently. So, it is necessary to articulate standards for the adequate preservation of this architecture according to society's current needs but preserving its authenticity. The research takes the Historic Settlement of Seville (Spain) study. It is the second largest one in Europe, being characterised by the importance and relevance of its heritage. Besides, it allows us to analyse how the insertion of a considerable number of modern buildings in a consolidated city has been.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".