MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7037467411

Enhancing Additive-Subtractive Hybrid Manufacturing: Addressing the Lubrication Challenge in the Subtractive Process for Improving the Surface Integrity of AISI H13

2024· dissertation· en· W7037467411 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMachiningLubricantMachinabilityCoolantLubricationSurface integrityCoating
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a type of steel with notable resistance to thermal fatigue, cracking, and abrasion, AISI H13, is known for its machining ease, high hardness, and consistent heat treatment response. These qualities make AISI H13 a preferred choice for fabricating dies, moulds, and tools exposed to high temperatures, rendering it popular in metalworking. Enhanced cooling technology in die and casting moulds necessitates intricate geometries achievable through additive manufacturing (AM). To further advance part complexity and surface finish in inaccessible regions, the industry is increasingly adopting additive-subtractive hybrid manufacturing (ASHM), showing promising growth. There are, however, some concerns associated with this process, especially with the subtraction part, which is done through machining. These include the low machinability of the workpiece due to the higher hardness of additively manufactured parts compared to conventional methods. These issues are more pronounced in ASHM processes because liquid coolants or lubricants cannot be easily used, nor can the parts be heat-treated before machining. As a first step in this study, we performed a comprehensive literature review on solid lubricants used in machining so far. Their effectiveness, mechanisms, challenges, and recent developments were discussed in detail. The main purpose of this study was to introduce and investigate the effectiveness of our novel metallic solid lubricant coating for machining of AISI H13 additive manufactured parts in ASHM processes. Since the goal of this study was to mimic the ASHM process, the lubricant coating was used in dry machining, without the application of any liquid lubricant or coolant. Moreover, the workpiece was not heat treated and the tests were performed on an as-built additively manufactured AISI H13 part. A detailed study was performed to assess the impact of these lubricant coatings on AISI H13 surface integrity. The findings showed that the soft metallic lubricant coating considerably reduced the machining force and improved the surface roughness subsurface properties of the part. This method proved to be an effective solution for avoiding lubricants in ASHM processes, while significantly improving the machinability of AISI H13 parts in ASHM processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→