MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7037483823

The effects of creatine, lithium, and co-supplementation on total creatine concentration in muscle from male and female rats

2023· other· en· W7037483823 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphocreatineCreatineSkeletal muscleCreatine MonohydrateLithium chlorideLithium (medication)Energy metabolismSucrose
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Creatine (Cr) is an element necessary to maintain muscle function in tissues with high energy demand. This is because Cr and phosphocreatine (PCr) play a critical role in cellular energy provision and intracellular shuttling through the Cr-PCr immediate energy system. Cr can be synthesized endogenously, as well as consumed exogenously via diet or supplementation. Literature supports the potential for increased Cr uptake to augment several factors of human performance – most namely muscle function in sports related to strength, speed, and power. Moreover, recent research suggests potential for lithium (Li) to upregulate Cr uptake and Cr transport into cells. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to investigate the individual and combined effects of creatine monohydrate (CM) and lithium chloride (LiCl) supplementation on Cr content in rat cardiac and skeletal muscle in vivo. Potential sex-specific effects were also explored. 64 Sprague-Dawley rats (32 males, 32 females) were randomized into four experimental groups: control (CON), creatine (Cr), lithium (Li), and creatine-lithium (Cr-Li). CM (5 g/L) and LiCl (0.2 g/L) were provided to rats via drinking water. All groups were provided ad libitum access to their respective drinking water (all supplemented with 0.5% sucrose for palatability) and AIN- 93G rodent diet. When males and females were examined together, intramuscular total creatine concentration ([TCr]) was greater (p<0.01) with CM supplementation compared to LiCl supplementation and tended to be greater (p=0.0706) than CON in cardiac muscle. There were no significant main effects for treatment in any of the skeletal muscle outcomes examined. A main effect for sex revealed that male rats had greater [TCr] than female rats, in extensor digitorum longus (EDL) (p<0.01). In soleus (SOL) and EDL, female rats had greater total glycogen synthase 3 beta (GSK3β) protein expression compared to males (p<0.05), but there were no significant effects of treatment observed. Protein content of the creatine transporter (CrT) was greater in males than females in cardiac muscle (p<0.05). It was also greater in CON rats compared to Li (p<0.01) and CrLi (p<0.05) supplemented rats, in SOL. In conclusion, supplementation with CM, with or without LiCl, altered TCr concentrations in a tissue-dependent manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)→Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology Research→French-language works237,207→