MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037555517

Efficacy and Safety of One Shot of Hyaluronic Acid in Hip Osteoarthritis: Postmarketing Clinical Follow-Up for Real-World Evidence

2024· article· en· W7037555517 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViscosupplementationOsteoarthritisPostmarketing surveillanceVisual analogue scaleCohortClinical efficacyRetrospective cohort studyCohort study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amparo Santamaría Torroba,1 María Pilar Acin Lazaro,2 Elena Gómez-Rubio,3 Pilar Coronel Granado3 1Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Provincial Nuestra Señora de Gracia, Zaragoza, Spain; 2Pain Unit, Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain; 3Scientific Department, Meiji Pharma Spain, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, SpainCorrespondence: Pilar Coronel Granado, Scientific Department, Meiji Pharma Spain, Avda. de Madrid, 94, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28802, Spain, Tel +34 91 8870980, Email p.coronel@meiji.esPurpose: This study aims to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of intra-articular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA) injections in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). Given the increasing burden of hip osteoarthritis and limited evidence supporting viscosupplementation in this context, this research aims to provide valuable insights under real clinical practice conditions.Patients and Methods: An observational, cross-sectional and retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of patients with hip OA treated with a single injection of HA (Adant One, Meiji Pharma Spain, Spain) from January 2021 to December 2022. Data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes were collected. Efficacy regarding pain relief and/or function improvement was assessed at 6 months using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Data were pseudonymized. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Autonomous Community of Aragon (CEICA).Results: The study included 40 patients with a mean age of 62.8 years, with 72.5% being female. Significant improvement was observed six-months post-treatment: 25% and 18.5% reduction in pain (VAS and WOMAC, respectively), 11.6% improvement in function (WOMAC), 7.4% improvement in stiffness (WOMAC), and 13.6% improvement in total WOMAC. No adverse events were reported.Conclusion: A single injection of IA HA significantly improved pain and function in patients with hip OA. These findings support the use of viscosupplementation for hip OA management and underscore the need for further studies to confirm these results and assess the long-term benefits of IA HA in hip OA.Keywords: rehabilitation, real clinical practice, rheumatology, traumatology

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207