The eve of transition - the IT sessions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
➤ About 370 GEC researchers met between 16 an 18 October in Montréal, Canada, at the Wyndham Hotel for the 5 th Open Meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community.The participants represented various fields of study such as political science, sociology, geography, psychology or ecology.A lot of them had met before -at the Open Meeting in Rio in 2001 maybe or at one of the IHDP sponsored workshops.There was a spirit of joyful reunion throughout the conference.At the same time one could spot many new faces -young academics from North and South alike, who in spite of the initially confusing premises of the hotel conference rooms and halls, eagerly linked up with each other and with the wider community present.Participants who had arrived a bit earlier attended the welcome reception in the honourable halls of the McGill Faculty Club and a public lecture held by Barbara Göbel, Executive Director of IHDP, on Wednesday evening.The Montréal based McGill School of Environment hosted this Open Meeting, while the IHDP, the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) and the Center for International
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.102 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".