El sistema de costos por procesos y su incidencia en la determinaci??n del costo y utilidad de la empresa rafia especial norte el rey s.a.c. trimestre mayo - julio del 2016
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis entitled: THE SYSTEM COST BY PROCESSES AND THEIR IMPACT \nON THE DETERMINATION OF THE COST AND UTILITY OF THE \nUNDERTAKING SPECIAL RAFIA NORTH KING S.A.C, QUARTER MAY-JULY \n2016., has as main objective to demonstrate that the cost system by processes has a \nsignificant influence on the determination of the cost and utility of the undertaking \nSpecial Rafia North King S. A. C., the quarter May-July 2016. \nFor the development of this research work was used data collection instruments such \nas the direct observation, documentary analysis and an interview with the General \nManager, by which they managed to collect information from the most relevant aspects \nof the problem under study, it was also found the existence of six production processes \n(Preparation and Milled, Casting, Cooling, Stretching, Ovillado and Enlisted), which \nare involved in the production of the raffia. \nThis research allowed us to analyze each one of the processes of production of the \ncompany and to classify the costs and costs incurred in order to develop each of these \nprocesses. \nAlso it was determined that the company does not apply procedures, or documents necessary to enable it to carry out an efficient control of the raw material and inputs \nused in the production of the raffia, with the application of the system of costs by \nprocesses are managed to prove that this contributes to reducing the cost of production, \ncontrolling each of its processes, manage useful information, and maximize their profits. \nFinally, it was possible to demonstrate that the cost system by processes has a \nsignificant influence on the determination of the cost and utilit y of the undertaking \nSpecial Rafia North King S. A. C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".