MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037632149

Fonds des directeurs et directeurs adjoints de cabinet de Frédéric Mitterrand [ENP Arles]

2019· other· fr· W7037632149 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2019
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicLegal Cases and Commentary
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCabinet (room)Quarter (Canadian coin)Historiography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Référence FR AN 20170079/ Intitulé Fonds des directeurs et directeurs adjoints de cabinet de Frédéric Mitterrand Dates extrêmes 2006-2012 Niveau de description Sous-fonds Importance matérielle 66 cartons de type Dimab Nom du producteur Cabinet de Frédéric Mitterrand Historique de la conservation Le fonds est conservé aux Archives nationales Présentation du contenu Article FR AN 20170079/121 : École nationale supérieure de la photographie d'Arles, fonctionnement et missions : not...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicLegal Cases and CommentaryFrench-language works237,207