Emakumeen presentzia euskal hedabideetan: GMMP monitorizazioaen 2020ko emaitzak Hego Euskal Herrian
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1995eko urtarrilaren 18an, lehenengo aldiz, emakumeek hedabideetan zuten errepresentazioa neurtu zuen World Association for Christian Communication (WACC) elkarteak koordinatutako Global Media Monitoring Project delakoak, MediaWatch Canada elkartearekin batera. Harrezkero, bost urtero egin ohi da monitorizazio globala. Espainiako Estatuko erakundeek 2000. urteko neurketan parte hartu zuten lehenengo aldiz; lehenengo edizio hartan, 71 herritako zenbait ikertzailek hartu zuten parte, eta gaur egun 100dik gora dira herri parte-hartzaileak. Euskal Herritik 2015ean saiatu ginen neurketa sarean sartzen, baina ez ginen garaiz heldu. 2020an, berriz, lortu dugu: lehenengo aldiz, EAEko eta Nafarroako komunikabideak sartu dira emakumeen hedabideetako presentzia neurtzea xede duen monitorizazio globalean, beti ere GMMP Spain delakoaren antolaketak ezarritako irizpideen arabera. Hala ere, oinarri horietatik harago joanda, datu bilketan Euskal Herriko lagin oso bat aztertzea erabaki genuen —datu horiek ikerketa ofizialean sartuko ez diren arren, ikerketa orokorrarekin alderatu ahal izateko asmoz bildu genituen—.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it