El control del dolor en la Unidad de Cuidados Paliativos - Plan de cuidados estandarizado
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Palliative care focus on attending patients during terminal stage, trying to improve their quality of life, create comfort, alleviate pain and giving complete support to both patients and his family.The role of nursing in this unit is very important because it includes every type of care the patient and his family may need, including teaching them about pain control.There are several sorts of pain according to their duration and by their physiopathology which makes mandatory the use of standard tools.McGill's Pain Scale is the most complete pain dimension tool as it evaluates pain in three dimensions, allowing us to elaborate a complete evaluation of pain and helping us improving our patients pain control.Pain is a subjective experience and sometimes it can limit and affect daily activities during patients life, making it ideal to often measure pain and teaching the patient he must not wait until it simply disappears.The usage of a Standarized Care Plan in this unit can help us managing patients pain with both pharmacologic and non pharmacologic methods, making them choose between different strategies if there are no medical contraindications, creating a comfortable environment during this stage of patients life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it