El bisonte de América: historia, polémica y leyenda
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The species Bison-bison appeared in North America more than five thousand years ago. During its heyday, hundreds of bison herds lived in a large area that comprised the territories of what nowadays is known as Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The discovery of the New World had as one of its main events the encounter of the Europeans with the bison, which from that moment on were related to the acquisition of knowledge about North America and to the appropriation and the conquest of it. This book presents a version of those modern episodes that occurred between the sixteenth and the nineteenth centuries. Furthermore, it deals with some polemical subjects concerning bison and which, from the sixteenth to the twentieth century, have been developed in various chronicles, scientific studies, myths, and legends. In this volume, the reader will also find the similarities and differences between bison, bulls, and common cows, besides several points which are important in order to know the symbolic and imaginary world of this species within the cultural universe of humans, a universe that, from the Antiquity to the present has sacralized and/or demonized the bull—and its kin—as well as its particular attributes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".