Evaluation of the Aphidius colemani-Rhopalosiphum padi banker plant system in greenhouse biological control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Banker plants are mobile habitats that provide alternate hosts or food for commercially available natural enemies. As a biological control strategy, banker plants offer a novel non-chemical approach to managing commonly encountered pests in the greenhouse. Most banker plants that target aphids consist of a graminaceous plant, a nonpest cereal grain aphid, and a parasitoid that attacks both the non-pest and pest aphids occurring on crop plants. Use of banker plants may provide more effective, long-term pest control than pesticide applications, but both can be combined. Banker plant systems have been used commercially in areas of the United States, Canada, Europe, and Asia. One of my goals was to ascertain if banker plants are a viable aphid pest management technique in the southwestern United States. The following study is an overview of the history of biological control in enclosed environments, the Aphidius colemani-Rhopalosiphum padi banker plant system in Oklahoma, pesticides compatible with A. colemani natural enemies, the costs and benefits of the Aphidius colemani-Rhopalosiphum padi system to manage aphid pests, and alternative species of grasses for potential use as banker plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".