An examination of career paths of Aboriginal women principals of band-controlled schools
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, I describe and analyze selected aspects of the caree paths of five Aboriginal women working as principals of band-controlled schools.The purpose is to explore the career paths of the participants and to relate the experiences that the women had in their lives that led them to become principals of band-controlled schools.In this qualitative research study, I focus on the challenges that they face and on the supports that enable them to overcome and cope with the challenges, prior to becoming principals and in their work as school principals.The data for this study is derived from interviews with five Aboriginal women who related their perspectives and experiences in their careers as Aboriginal women educators in Manitoba.The participants were chosen from a group of women who responded to an invitation to participate in the study and who met the specific criteria.All five of the participants shared their experiences openly and willingly and the data that they provided is described according to common themes and then analyzed and interpreted using qualitative research methodology.The literature review for this study includes the background that puts the study in its important historical context.The findings from this study are grouped according to the three research questions, career paths, challenges and supports.The career paths of the five participants were influenced by these factors: (a) early life experiences and family expectations, (b) the motivation to become teachers and principals was initially for economic stability and a secure income but later evolved to a commitment to make things better for children, (c) the women in this study are highly qualified for their positions and have a commitment to continuous 6 learning, evidenced by their high academic qualifications, (d) they taught for a relatively short time prior to becoming principals and did not actively pursue a position as principal but were either appointed or accepted the position unexpectedly because of a situation in the community they were working in at the time of initial appointment, (e) for four of the five participants there was an issue of working in their home communities, where there was a lack of acceptance or political interference with their employment as principais, and (f) the participants stressed a high commitment to making things better for the children and were comfortable and confident in their ability as educational leaders.The challenges that the participants faced: (a) lack of opportunity, poverty and dependence on social assistance were early challenges, (b) retuming to post-secondary studies after being in out of school for many years, (c) family responsibilities and role conflict made it diffrcult for their studies and careers to go smoothly, (d) being unprepared and untrained for entry into administration, (e) did not plan to go into administration but were asked or appointed to the position unexpectedly, ( lack of acceptance in their home communities, and (g) societal attitudes of discrimination and sexism interfered with their careers at some point.The participants relied on the following supports: (a) role models including fathers, friends, other teachers and superiors, (b) mentors were husbands, friends, elders, family members and colleagues, (c) networking, (d) spirituality, and (e) academic qualifications.Recommendations for actions: (a) develop training programs for aspiring Aboriginal teachers who work in band controlled schools, (b) begin to build an administration pool for potential school administrators, (c) establish a formal networking group for principals of band-controlled schools, and (d) provide a support system for current principals ofbandcontrolled schools.Recommendations for further study: (a) do a similar study of principals of bandcontrolled schools including both men and women relating it to turnover of school administration and how this has affected the progress of band-controlled schools, (b) conduct a similar study with a larger sample of Aboriginal women, (c) do a life history interview study of an Aboriginal woman who has been in education for many years in Manitoba, (d) conduct a longitudinal study about women in Aboriginal education, and (e) conduct a study about leadership for Aboriginal schools, what works best, possibly servant ieadership model.These are some of the suggestions for fuither study but the list can be greatly extended as I discovered in doing this study, that more research is needed in many areas in Aboriginal education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".