MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037729546

Evolution of the transcriptional regulatory networks of ascomycetes

2009· dissertation· en· W7037729546 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBroad Institute
KeywordsRegulonPhylogenetic treeTranscription factorTranscription (linguistics)Rate of evolutionFunction (biology)PhylogeneticsAdaptive evolutionRibosomal protein
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In contrast to protein structure and to metabolic networks, an organism's transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) is highly plastic and has been reported to be the target of numerous mutations affecting the phenotype. The ascomycetes fungi are an ideal phylogenetic branch to look at TRN evolution by assessing the conservation of transcription factors (TF) and TF binding sites. In this thesis I 1) describe new tools to assess protein function in Candida albicans, 2) report a novel mode of TRN evolution that we named TF substitution that occurred in the evolution of the ribosomal protein (RP) regulon and 3) explore the large-scale transcription network reorganization of two RP TRNs with distinct wirings and TF substitutions. This work leads to a broader understanding of the span of TRN evolution at the organismal level in ascomycetes. These findings illustrate the extent of TRN plasticity in the evolution of fungi. They also raise questions regarding the rate and importance of TRN changes in the evolution of eukaryotes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207