Evaluation of a model system for the mechanistic study of gene targeting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gene targeting is a process of recombinational exchange between a foreign molecule of DNA and its homologous chromosomal counterpart whereby the cellular machinery involved in homologous recombination accomplishes sequence exchange. The widespread use of gene targeting as a basic research and/or therapeutic tool has been precluded by its inherent inefficiency. Although many studies have reported improved gene targeting efficacy via manipulation of homologous recombination-associated proteins, reports examining the underlying molecular mechanisms of gene targeting are scant. Improvement in our understanding of these molecular mechanisms will undoubtedly lead to advancements in the study of genetic disease, and perhaps to the development of viable human gene therapy. To this end, the following is a report of the development and preliminary assessment of a model system for the study of the molecular mechanisms of gene targeting. Specifically, this system entailed the investigation of recombinational exchange between isogenic, non-functional copies of HSV-tk contained in a targeting plasmid and a stably integrated target plasmid, in Ltk-cells. Results showed an absolute random integration frequency of our targeting construct in the range of 10-4---a value ten-fold lower than classically associated with random integration. Also, linearization of our targeting plasmid outside the region of homology to our stably integrated chromosomal target appeared to be associated with an undetectable level of targeting. Similarly, non-homology---in the form of three non-silent point mutations in our target sequence---appeared to impede gene targeting. These initial results suggest that the design of this model system needs to be revised to allow proper investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying gene targeting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".