MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037782862

Estudo histopatológico e imuno-histológico dos tumores linfóides da conjuntiva e orbita

2015· other· pt· W7037782862 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) · 2015
Typeother
Languagept
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)HT1080Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A orbita e um sitio preferencial de lesoes linfoides que incluem linfomas extranodais e hiperplasias linfoides. A diferenciacao histopatologica entre hiperplasia linfoide e linfoma pode ser dificultada particularmente em biopsias pequenas. Tecido linfoide associado a mucosa (MALT) e um acumulo adquirido de celulas linfoides no estroma conjuntival sempre associado ao epitelio. Os tumores linfoides da conjuntiva devem ser classificados em hiperplasia linfoide ou linfoma dependendo das caracteristicas histopatologicas do infiltrado linfoide. O objetivo deste estudo e de analisar as caracteristicas histopatologicas e imuno-histoquimicas que nos permite o diagnostico correto dos tumores linfoides tanto da orbita quanto da conjuntiva. Os 55 casos de tumores orbitarios e 35 casos de lesoes linfoides conjuntivais foram obtidas do Registro de Patologia Ocular da Universidade McGill em Montreal - Canada e da Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Preparados histopatologicos fixados em formalina e embebidos em parafina foram corados para mercadores de celulas B e T. Anticorpos monoclonais para as cadeias leves de imunoglobulina kappa e lambda foram realizados para determinar a natureza poli ou monoclonal dos tumores linfoides. Baseados no diagnostico histopatologico 11 casos orbitarios foram inflamacao cronica idiopatica (20 por cento), 22 casos como classificados corno (40 por cento) e 22 casos como linfoma (40 por cento). Do total dos 22 linfomas orbitarios, 14 expressaram apenas cadeia leve tipo lambda (36,4 por cento). As hiperplasias linfoides foram positivas ou negativas para ambas cadeias leves. A inflamacao cronica idiopatica da orbita foi positiva para mercadores B e T com no minimo 50 por cento de celulas T. As hiperplasias linfoides mostraram positividade de ate 30 por cento de celulas T enquanto os predominantemente compostos por celulas B (90 por cento). Dezessete dos 35 casos da conjuntiva representaram linfomas do tipo MALT enquanto I B foram diagnosticados como hiperplasia linfoide conjuntival. As caracteristicas histopatologicas para diferenciar linfoma MALT de hiperplasia linfoide conjuntival incluiram numero de corpusculo de Dutcher e atividade mitotica. A infiltracao epitelial foi encontrada em ambos linfoma do tipo MALT e hiperplasia linfoide. Todos os 17 linfomas do tipo MALT demonstraram no minimo 80 por cento de celulas...(au)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo)Same topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207