An Environmentally Conscious Robust Optimization Approach for Planning Power Generating Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbon dioxide is a main greenhouse gas that is responsible for global warming and climate change. The reduction in greenhouse gas emission is required to comply with the Kyoto Protocol. Looking at CO2 emissions distribution in Canada, the electricity and heat generation sub-sectors are among the largest sources of CO2 emissions. In this study, the focus is to reduce CO2 emissions from electricity generation through capacity expansion planning for utility companies. In order to reduce emissions, different mitigation options are considered including structural changes and non structural changes. A drawback of existing capacity planning models is that they do not consider uncertainties in parameters such as demand and fuel prices. \n \nStochastic planning of power production overcomes the drawback of deterministic models by accounting for uncertainties in the parameters. Such planning accounts for demand uncertainties by using scenario sets and probability distributions. However, in past literature different scenarios were developed by either assigning arbitrary values or by assuming certain percentages above or below a deterministic demand. Using forecasting techniques, reliable demand data can be obtained and can be inputted to the scenario set. The first part of this thesis focuses on long term forecasting of electricity demand using autoregressive, simple linear, and multiple linear regression models. The resulting models using different forecasting techniques are compared through a number of statistical measures and the most accurate model was selected. Using Ontario electricity demand as a case study, the annual energy, peak load, and base load demand were forecasted, up to year 2025. In order to generate different scenarios, different ranges in economic, demographic and climatic variables were used. \n \nThe second part of this thesis proposes a robust optimization capacity expansion planning model that yields a less sensitive solution due to the variation in the above parameters. By adjusting the penalty parameters, the model can accommodate the decision maker’s risk aversion and yield a solution based upon it. The proposed model is then applied to Ontario Power Generation, the largest power utility company in Ontario, Canada. Using forecasted data for the year 2025 with a 40% CO2 reduction from the 2005 levels, the model suggested to close most of the coal power plants and to build new natural gas combined cycle turbines and nuclear power plants to meet the demand and CO2 constraints. The model robustness was illustrated on a case study and, as expected, the model was found to be less sensitive than the deterministic model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".