MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037864243

Essential oils in edible films and coatings

2012· other· en· W7037864243 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada)) · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHemiptera Insect Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShelf lifeAntimicrobialFood additiveFood preservationHealth benefitsEdible oilActive packagingFood industryFood productsFood safety
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In spite of modern technologies and safety concepts, such as HACCP, the reported numbers of food-borne illnesses and intoxications are still increasing. According to Health and Welfare Canada, the annual costs to treat foodborne illness are estimated at $1 billion in Canada and from $5 to $86 billion in the United States. Essential oils have long served as flavouring agents in food and beverages, and due to their versatile content of antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds; they possess potential as natural agents for food preservation. Active compounds can be added to food packaging in order to extend the shelf life, preserve the color and improve the nutritional value of foods. The use of edible films offers the possibility to improve the efficiency of the antimicrobial compounds and prolong the shelf life of foods by assuring a control release of the active compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada))Same topicHemiptera Insect StudiesFrench-language works237,207