Exploring violence against socially vulnerable Inuit women in Denmark
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to explore violence against socially vulnerable Inuit women in Denmark.This paper will study why socially vulnerable Inuit women are exposed to violence, what type of violence they are victims of and whom the perpetrators are in Denmark.The data used in this study consists of semi-structured interviews with professionals, who work or have worked with socially vulnerable Inuit women in Denmark.A methodological approach by Braun and Clarke, the thematic analysis is applied.The results showed the colonization of Greenland created historical trauma which has led to intergenerational trauma and consequently influenced mental health, substance abuse and violence.Additionally, a normalization of violence is present in Greenland and in the socially vulnerable environment in Denmark.Furthermore, a lack of knowledge about Inuit in the Danish system influence Inuit women to social exclusion in Denmark.These women are subjected to all types of violence by someone they know, either friends, family, friends of the family, current or previous partners.These results will be discussed with in the theoretical framework of intergenerational trauma and normalization process theory.Therefore, socially vulnerable Inuit women in Denmark are victims of intimate partner violence and are subjected to physical-, sexual-, psychological-, and economical violence, influenced by intergenerational trauma and a normalization of violence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".