Exploring the Range of Projectile Point Types on the Late Woodland Middle Ontario Iroquoian Dorchester Village Site
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nettling (7500-8000 B.C) • Found in small numbers at least as far north as latitude 44 degrees in Southwestern Ontario and are most common in the Northwestern Erie drainage basin.• Seems to be one of the earliest Archaic styles to reach Ontario.• Nettling points are well made, corner-notched and often serrated.Brewerton Corner Notched (2500-3500 B.C) • Found throughout much of eastern North America, although reported under a variety of more-or-less synonymous type names.• Brewerton points are broad bladed and there is also a side-notched variety that could be a resharpened version of the corner notched style.Raddatz (6000-3000 B.C) • Well made and finely serrated.• Not a commonly identified type in Ontario.Genesee (1900-1400 B.C) • In southwestern Ontario, most Genesees are found in the Carolinian biotic province.• Genesee points are very large and, with their "Christmas-tree" shape, are one of the most distinctive styles found in the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".