MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7037932715

Expression and purification of recombinant HIV-1 BH10 Tat protein

2001· other· en· W7037932715 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComplementary DNATransactivationGeneRecombinant DNARNA splicingPeriplasmic spaceAmino acidNucleotideTransfectionNucleic acid sequence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is the causative agent of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). The HIV-1 BH10 genome encodes a two-exon gene for an 86 amino acid viral transactivator protein (Tat) that markedly enhances viral transcription. The objective of the present research was to develop an expression and purification system to produce HIV-1 BH10 Tat1-86 for structural analysis. We first attempted to express Tat protein with a PelB leader sequence for secretion into the periplasmic space of 'E. Coli'. We next expressed Tat with a cleavable 6-histidine purification tag at the amino terminus. The presence of several codons in the HIV-1 BH10 'tat' cDNA that are rarely used in ' E. coli' was investigated as a cause of low levels of protein expression. To this end, a 'tat' cDNA was produced by splicing nucleotides 1-186 of a Tat gene composed of frequently used 'E. coli' codons with nucleotides 187-258 of the HIV-1 BH10 'tat' cDNA. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.127
Teacher spread0.125 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics→French-language works237,207→