MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037995695

Fonction des outillages lithiques du Néolithique ancien au Néolithique moyen dans le Bassin parisien

2020· other· fr· W7037995695 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2020
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVenomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationPlankQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce projet, dans sa seconde année de réalisation, se propose d’étudier la destination fonctionnelle des industries lithiques néolithiques du Bassin parisien du Néolithique ancien (Rubané, groupe de Villeneuve-Saint-Germain ou VSG) au Néolithique moyen (Cerny, Epi-Rossen, Chasséen, Michelsberg). Il réunit une vingtaine de chercheurs, belges et français.En 1998, les analyses ont porté sur un échantillon Cerny du site de Balloy « Les Réaudins » (Île-de-France), un échantillon provenant de sites ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicVenomous Animal Envenomation and StudiesFrench-language works237,207