MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038062242

Genetic risk factors for suicide in major depression : a focus on the serotonin transporter and tryptophan hydroxylase-2 genes

2005· dissertation· en· W7038062242 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTPH2Serotonin transporterTryptophan hydroxylaseContext (archaeology)SerotonergicDepression (economics)Vulnerability (computing)Poison controlGenetic association
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growing evidence suggests a partial genetic determination of suicide predisposition, with most studies focusing on serotonergic genes. Inconsistent results have characterized the serotonin transporter (5-HTT) gene, whereas few studies have investigated the recently discovered brain specific tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH2) gene. At the same time, most of these studies have not controlled for associated psychopathology, an important confounder. Therefore, association studies were conducted to investigate the role of the 5-HTT and TPH2 genes in suicide susceptibility in the context of major depression and their effect on impulsive-aggressive behaviors (IABs), a possible intermediate phenotype. Finally, suicide predictors were investigated while controlling for genetic, clinical and behavioral risk factors. Certain 5-HTT and TPH2 genetic variants were significantly implicated in the vulnerability to suicide, however, no effect on levels of IABs was observed. Genetic and clinical suicide predictors were identified while controlling for other risk factors. Further studies in larger samples are necessary to replicate these findings and detect possible small genetic effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicFossil Insects in AmberFrench-language works237,207