God, Ownership, and Economic Language in the Second Century CE: Irenaeus of Lyon’s "Against Heresies" as a Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The series at hand is a product of the German Research Foundation-sponsored Collaborative Research Centre TRR 294, "Structural Change of Property," based primarily at the Universities of Jena and Erfurt.This series is dedicated to the systematic, interdisciplinary study of the topics outlined above and features outstanding scholarly works on the past, present, and future of property.6 Cf.Herrmann-Pillath 2023, 22: "Feudal land law is only one example for the universal phenomenon that possession of land was never strictly individualized before the emergence of capitalist property."7 For Classical antiquity, and only in some specific cases for Late antiquity, the abbreviations of ancient authors and their works follow the fourth edition of the Oxford Classical Dictionary, edited by Hornblower-Spawforth-Eidinow 2012.8 For antiquity, see, for instance, Gai.Inst.2.2-3, 5-6, 9.For modern times, the scholarly debate is extensive, so we will only mention a few important scholars who have evaluated earlier ideas and advanced the 'state of the art', such as Ramon 2016/2017;
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".