H88-0393.50. Chapel Choir. Records, 1931-[ongoing]. 5.50 linear ft. PARTIALLY RESTRICTED
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Hope College Chapel Choir was started as a group to lead the daily student chapel services. It is first listed in the Hope College Bulletin in 1930. Its first director was W. Curtis Snow, the college’s organist. Other directors were Harold Tower (1935-1936), Kenneth Osborne (1936-1941), Robert Cavanaugh (1941-1974), Roger Rietberg (1974-1990), J. Scott Ferguson (1990-1994), James Morrow (1994-1997), Peter Jermihov (1997-1998) and Brad Richmond (1998-present). The Chapel Choir has conducted a number of tours over spring break to various parts of the United States and Canada. The first was in 1953. Chapel Choir has also toured Europe a number of times. The collection includes correspondence, programs, press books for Chapel Choir European and spring tours, scrapbooks, reel-to-reel recordings and compact discs (CD) for concerts and 1976 memorial service for Robert Cavanaugh.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.918 | 0.859 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".