MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038281605

Guidelines For Controlling Canada Goose Populations And
\nInjurious Canada Goose Activities, November 26, 2013

2013· other· en· W7038281605 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIowa Publications Online (State Library of Iowa) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHistorical and Modern Theater Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGoosePopulationPopulation controlControl (management)Wildlife managementNatural (archaeology)Disease control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This document describes the Iowa Department of Natural Resource’s (DNR) Canada goose management philosophy and provides specific procedures for implementing practices to control Canada goose populations where geese are considered overabundant and/or their activities pose a risk to human health or safety. These procedures will help ensure that Canada goose population control activities are implemented in a uniform, responsible, and humane manner throughout Iowa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIowa Publications Online (State Library of Iowa)Same topicHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesFrench-language works237,207