MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038281758

How is a new space entrepreneur ecosystem created

2024· other· en· W7038281758 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWarwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyJohnson Space CenterUniversity of WarwickNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer ControlNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)AffordanceEcosystemLiberian dollarValue (mathematics)Entrepreneurship
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emerging new space commercial market is rapidly approaching a trillion dollar economy. Communities with aspirations to impact their socio-economicposition are creating space entrepreneur ecosystems to participate in this new economy. This research explores the creation of a space entrepreneurial ecosystem from three perspectives. The first is from the space entrepreneur (astropreneur), the second from a community’s ability to create value from the affordances available to them from space technology, and the third from the stakeholders that create the networks and access to resources before the emergence of the first astropreneur. Below, I have summarized the abstract for the three journal articles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0240.022
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWarwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick)Same topicFossil Insects in AmberFrench-language works237,207