Implication parentale pour l'apprentissage du francais selon La methode Claire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette etude a pour but d'examiner la pratique de l'implication parentale dans l'apprentissage du francais telle que proposee par La methode Claire (Chenier, 1993). Le premier chapitre presente La methode Claire sous les deux volets de la lecture et de l'ecriture inseres dans un programme qui touche les divers domaines de l'apprentissage de la langue francaise et qui implique les parents, surtout par le biais des devoirs. Le deuxieme chapitre examine les mouvements politiques, economiques et sociaux qui supportent l'implication des parents dans l'apprentissage. Le troisieme chapitre presente les resultats d'une recherche qualitative qui explore jusqu'a quel point La methode Claire rejoint ses objectifs dans la pratique. Enfin, le quatrieme chapitre discute de ces donnees theoriques et empiriques en mettant en evidence que La methode Claire pour l'apprentissage du francais s'exerce sur trois fronts qui ont une influence mutuelle incontestable. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.070 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".