MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038416546

Ikea recalls children's nightlight

2015· other· en· W7038416546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommissionProduct (mathematics)Shock (circulatory)Electrical shockCover (algebra)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical shock caused by using a children's nightlight is the reason behind Ikea's latest product recall. A children's night light that can apparently deliver an electric shock to users has been recalled by Ikea... The Consumer Product Safety Commission says the company's recalling more than 400-THOUSAND 'Patrull' nightlights. It comes after several complaints...including one case in Austria where a child tried to remove it from an outlet...and the plastic cover came off. The child had a minor shock and ended up with wounds on the hand. So far no injuries have been reported in the U-S or Canada. The C-P-S-C says the lights come in white, orange and pink colors and are sold for about $4-dollars. If you have one, stop using it and return it to the store for a full refund.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)Same topicComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207