Identifying Nursing Activities to Estimate the Risk of Cross-contamination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hospital Acquired Infections (HAI) are a global patient safety challenge, costly to treat, and affect hundreds of millions of patients annually worldwide. It has been shown that the majority of HAI are transferred to patients by caregivers' hands and therefore, can be prevented by proper hand hygiene (HH). However, many factors including cognitive load, cause caregivers to forget to cleanse their hands. Hand hygiene compliance among caregivers remains low around the world.\n\nIn this thesis I showed that it is possible to build a wearable accelerometer-based HH reminder system to identify ongoing nursing activities with the patient, indicate the high-risk activities, and prompt the caregivers to clean their hands.\n\nEight subjects participated in this study, each wearing five wireless accelerometer sensors on the wrist, upper arms and the back. A pattern recognition approach was used to classify six nursing activities offline. Time-domain features that included mean, standard deviation, energy, and correlation among accelerometer axes were found to be suitable features. On average, 1-Nearest Neighbour classifier was able to classify the activities with 84% accuracy.\n\nA novel algorithm was developed to adaptively segment the accelerometer signals to identify the start and stop time of each nursing activity. The overall accuracy of the algorithm for a total of 96 events performed by 8 subjects was approximately 87%. The accuracy was higher than 91% for 5 out of 8 subjects.\n\nThe sequence of nursing activities was modelled by an 18-state Markov Chain. The model was evaluated by recently published data. The simulation results showed that the high-risk of cross-contamination decreases exponentially by frequency of HH and this happens more rapidly up to 50%-60% hand hygiene rate. It was also found that if the caregiver enters the room with high-risk of transferring infection to the current patient, given the assumptions in this study, only 55% HH is capable of reducing the risk of infection transfer to the lowest level. This may help to prevent the next patient from acquiring infection, preventing an infection outbreak. The model is also capable of simulating the effects of the imperfect HH on the risk of cross-contamination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".