MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038444787

Impact of a boil water advisory on in-home water and food handling practices: A qualitative study

2006· dissertation· en· W7038444787 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2006
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicComparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus groupQualitative researchBathingBottled waterWater safetyPurchasingFood preparationHand washingCoping (psychology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boil water advisories (BWAs) are issued when municipal drinking water supplies are found to be contaminated with microbial pathogens. This event case study describes how a BWA in 2000 influenced in-home consumer practices in a small Canadian rural community with high rates of morbidity and mortality during a waterborne outbreak. Fifty-eight adult respondents answered opened-ended questions in focus groups or telephone interviews relating to a 198-day BWA. Responses from a purposive sample are presented. A home pathogen control framework systematically positioned self-reported handling practices of three groups (Mothers, Seniors, and Others) for assessment. Mothers reported using bottled water for all in-home activities, including bathing children, out of fear that boiling would not render the tap water safe. Older respondents had problems coping as evidenced by using potentially risky dishwashing practices, needing more time to change practices, reporting difficulties transporting water within the home, choosing to avoid purchasing fresh food for the duration of the event, and failing to recognize that Seniors are as much at risk for illness or complications as are young children. Seventy-two per cent of Others took two or more days to comply with the initial recommendations. Only males stated the BWA was not problematic. Issues requiring attention include: the need to provide multiple compelling messages repeatedly in more than one format targeted to specific at-risk groups; the need for messages to be prescriptive, practical, salient and timely for residents to change practices that reduce or eliminate crosscontamination and exposure; and a requirement that messages must be correct the first time they are presented. Respondents in this study were mostly well educated and experienced in handling food in the home but were unable to implement a full home pathogen control plan. Less well educated individuals or those with cognitive deficits would likely experience greater difficulty in managing the BWA. Changes in food purchasing and consumption patterns in a BWA of long duration could have serious nutritional implications for at-risk populations. The results are of greatest use to those preparing advisory messages for the general public or food and health professionals working with individuals during a waterborne outbreak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it