Infrastructure in Latin America : An \n Update, 1980-2006
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper documents the trends in \n infrastructure in major Latin American economies over the \n last quarter century. Drawing from an expanded and updated \n data set, the paper sheds light on the region's \n infrastructure performance along four major dimensions. \n First, the paper documents the trends in the quantity of \n Latin America's infrastructure assets, using a \n comparative cross-regional perspective. Second, the paper \n presents a battery of indicators of the quality of \n infrastructure services, taking the same comparative \n perspective. Third, the paper reviews Latin America's \n performance in terms of the universality of access to \n infrastructure services. Lastly, the paper offers a detailed \n account of the trends in infrastructure investment in Latin \n America's six major economies since 1980, disaggregated \n by both sector of origin (public and private) and \n destination (power, transport and telecommunications).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it